Відео

This is like a sleep asmr or something

Fake and that's all

I really enjoy your show. Thanks for all of your hard work

Great episode guy’s! Hi from New Zealand🇳🇿

I wonder if Stephen King heard this story back then? Being a clown phobe, he would have been freaked out. He lived in a wet area. The kids had to duck in to get to his lair. Things very similar to Pennywise.

Ooooh, I'm originally from Brownsville, TX too! The university there is on the location on an old civil war fort, Fort Brown. It's seriously haunted with ghost soldiers and more.

Is nobody going to mention that the child's description of a "'microphone' with a white flex up to his chest" could have just been some dude who just had a wank?

The black mane, is hiding g the zipper!!!

This is getting ridiculous!! P&G stories dont even match!! There is LOTS of evidence proving this a fake!! But there is no end to the gullible people!!!

Did you know Patterson had tried to make a bigfoot movie before all this and failed! Then he miraculously found one on his first try!!! How fortunate!!

14 minutes in and you guys are still not on topic. Bye.

I went through all the other comments expecting a common observation of file 10 to be a dog barking over people trying to talk in a room. I wonder if more calm spirits were trying to speak as a more aggressive dominant one drowns them out.

Patterson had tried to make a movie before this! Failed! The guy who made the suit, and the guy who wore the suit have both come forward and admitted it was a hoax! And passed a polygraph!! Thats just the beginning of the proof debunking P&G video!!

"what's the end game?" 5 minutes later "follow anyone!" Actual Jesus "I am the way the truth and the light, no man comes to the Father but by me " I think we spotted the end game of spirits playing friendly with you.

Humans dont linger around after they die. They go to one of two places, Abrahams busum or Hades. Whatever is on earth, must therefor be demonic.

I made a video related to this on my channel. If you’re interested in reviewing my imagery and want to also leave your thoughts. Thanks

Thi is my absolute favorite episode! i love all the history!!

Your comment was spot on regarding people who hear a claim where someone says they wore a suit and immediately think "welp, that's it. Time to hang it up this whole thing was faked, mystery solved". That is why a deep dive analysis like what you all are doing is so valuable. There is always context to statements people make, and the requirement for evidence to back it up is still there, just as it is for the party MAKING the claim...

The "ghost in a jar" concept is where we're at with the UFO/UAP stuff in 2024. SOMETHING is going on. We have confirmed sightings. We have military pilots testimonies that something is out there. We have DoD whistleblowers saying it's real. But a majority of the population won't say they believe UFOs are real despite all this.

This is so shit!!!

My personal, biblically based, opinions: Black-Eyed Kids are demons; the reason why their clothes are so out-dated, and why their eyes are black, is because God is trying to protect us. He lays down rules, like, "You can't come in without permission, and you can't look normal; and if they're still dumb enough to let you in, well that's on them." How would you handle these black-eyed kid demons? Believe in Jesus, and command them to leave in His name.

I am he.

The story about the car crash: That urgent feeling to get the heck out of there was the Holy Spirit of God telling her to leave, or she was going to go to Hell. It didn't sound like she was a Christian, so she would've gone to a place of misery and torment. Thank you for sharing these stories.

Timothy Alberino has some interesting theories about photographs and these paranormal types of creatures. The same reason we don’t get photos of these aliens and UFOs, they take your mental facilities that make it so you don’t think about photographing them until they’re gone.

I remember watching short circuit as a 90s kid. I remember it making me sad. Also, I’ve never heard anyone pronounce Wendigo the way Forrest does as Wen-dee-go. I wonder if that’s a west coast pronunciation🤔

You guys do an outstanding podcast. Normally, it's two idiots lauging at their own bad jokes and shouting over each other. Finally, guys with brain cells. Just subscribed.

As someone who use to teach elementary school I can tell you that full moon affects daytime behavior too.

Les Smith is fantastic in this interview.

That cat scared the crap outta me 🤣

Great podcast subbed

Satan masquerading as an angel of light… Michael being the name of an archangel. Why would a demon NOT lie and call himself Michael to make himself seem good and helpful? Be very careful messing with these entities and working with them. They are not here to help us I can guarantee you that. What ever is in Sallie House is evil.

Randomly chose this podcast to listen to while at work, and it turns out to be one of the most fascinating stories I've heard in a long time, true or not. Well done sirs!

The frustrating part of this story as a listener, is that if this is true, and there are lots of people who are familiar with this 'hole', why can it not be authenticated? Where did they all go? Why didn't the story spread beyond this tiny microcosm of people in the local area (beyond Mel calling the radio show)?

There’s no video

They're known as familiars thats why most of the time people get different and specific things like dead family members or perfect imitation of their voices familiar spirits they know you they know what scares you they know how to get emotion from you its all in the book

Kansas is interesting to me because my best friend since preschool who was born into a generational Luciferian family had programming telling her to report to Lawrence, Kansas when some apocalyptic event occurs.

Well done guys Dan Carlin would be proud

Sorry, I lasted as long as I could listening to the biologist but I had to tap out. Her voice cadence and vocal fry was appallingly unbearable and grating on the ears.

Well looks like I’m the First One To Start 🛫 Us Off. I would like to Thank you for all your Research work you must do,to bring these great Stories to Us all. I found you today just searching around ART BELL where I found you. Thank you again, and ILL BE BACK.

Hey You All I’m New To This EPISODE. My name is JEFFREY and I’m a 76 year young musician who loves to play guitar with my Friends and Band. I’m a PJ (PARA-RESCUE VIETNAM 1968-1975). Very Proud

I’m SO CONFUSED NOW IF I EVER WAS, ABOUT ARTS DEATH. ALL THIS TIME I WAS IN GREAT DENIAL ABOUT ART BEING GONE. THIS IS TRULY UNBELIEVABLE, AND MY PRAYERS ARE STILL WITH ART.💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎♥️♥️♥️♥️🕊🕊🕊🕊☘️☘️💨💨💨💨💨😊 IM VERY SORRY ABOUT THIS, but I have listened to ART since 1988, and just recently after Raising a Family and a Recording Band I looked up ART BELL. Still so SAD,SORRY,DEPRESSED he was always there when I called.

52:50 insane that Eyesoncinema became the best ufo archive on UA-cam after this.

51:54 you can catch tons of big catfish with a bar of soap on a hook, they love it.

So interesting😅😅😅 i need to hear more on this

😂

I would be willing to wager that the smaller cargo carried out of the crash sight were alien bodies.

I played file 10 for my husband who is a hospice nurse. I just wanted to see his reaction (I was terrified). All I told him beforehand was that this was an EVP recorded in an empty room on a voice activated recorder. After listening, he said it reminded him of a dementia patient, going between mumbling to himself and angry yelling. I thought it was kind of a weird take until I listened to this part 3 and learned what you guys hear in that recording. Now I am picturing some poor old man ghost kind of rocking back and forth, angry that countless strangers have been traipsing through his house with all manner of devices and lights, questions and demands. Kind of a sad thought.

mean I totally debunked the Patterson - Gimlin film and I have laid the challenge down and no one can deny it. I have spoken to key individuals and players in the Bigfoot community and they are aware of me and my debunking and they can't deny it or come up with plausible answers to the questions thrown at them. So I claim it. I, Jason Brazeal am the individual who has debunked the Patterson - Gimlin film and I did it in 3 ways, all of which cannot be disputed. The first was within the film itself. I destroyed the false narrative that FX artists did not have the technological capabilities at the time to pull off such a hoax. They most certainly did. In fact it's really interesting how it was done. Legendary FX man John Chambers played a part, it involved a mask from a Star Trek episode which aired in January of '67 called "The Galileo Seven" The neanderthal creatures depicted in this episode caught Roger Patterson's eye because he had self-published his Bigfoot book in '66 and was trying to put together an expedition documentary to sell to nature channels. He reached out to Chambers and went to Desilu Studios to visit him and basically they used that mask which Chambers had changed the hairpiece and added more hair on to it. There was a suit used from a Lost In Space episode and the mask and suit were a rental from Chambers essentially, but Roger wanted to customize the suit more so in addition to that he purchased one from Morris. Roger, being a cowboy was familiar with what wild animals tend to look like in terms of having mangy type hair, etc. So he took some clippers and shaved down some portions of the suit and used some of his horse supplies to assist in making the suit look a little more organic and real. There were arm extensions used underneath football shoulder pads which created a longer more proportional looking arm and created the illusion of a longer body and shorter legs. Charlie Gemora developed an old trick which is a sort of hand-me-down that is passed down through the FX community. What Gemora did was utilize a water bag invention as he called it that he would put inside the suit along with bulking material and this water bag would create the illusion of rippling muscles. This can be used for legs, chests, everywhere where there is noticeable locomotion essentially. This technique was developed in the 1940s and on Chambers advice he utilized this method. The footwear is obviously not the foot of an organic animal, the breats are obviously fake and are about 3 inches lower than they are supposed to be in terms of where the actual chest of the speciment is. The hairpiece is very obviously one similar to what Chambers typically uses. It looks like a bad messy Ringo Starr even. Very Chambers-esque. So anyway that is what is within the film which I have debunked and there are other things but this is a condensed summary to keep things cohesive. In short, it's a suit, it's a lie to say that it isn't or that it couldn't be and most of these people don't know what they're talking about when they discuss FX technology of the time. They don't understand illusions and FX work and how these illusions are pulled off and what was actually capable at the time. Key takeaway: Don't let your eyes fool you. And just because one FX job appears this way doesn't mean that another one will not require different methods and techniques that are relative to the needs of the specific illusion and it's execution. The second is the myth of Sasquatch being present in NAtive American Myth...it isn't but that's another discussion. THEN FINALLY THIS CANNOT BE DISPUTED BECAUSE IT CAN EASILY BE VERIFIED BY ANYONE. I mentioned that Roger had self-published his book "Do Abominable Snowmen Of America Really Exist?" in 1966. That is indisputable. he published it, it was in 1966 that he did this. Now, within the book there is an account of the Roe Incident which was a female Bigfoot encounter that Roger was obsessed with. Roger plagiarized a drawing of this Roe Incident that was originally done in 1961 for an article in a magazine by Ivan Sanderson. Morton Kuntsler was the artist. Roger Patterson plagiarized this image and published it in his 1966 book. Now, that is indisputable. That is a fact which is easily verified and you cannot argue that it didn't happen and that it didn't happen in 1966 because it did and it is all documented, it is in the copies of the book and is easily viewable. Well, this sketch is an exact, mirror duplication of what is contained in the Patterson - Gimlin film that was made in 1967 a year later. This is not possible. According to Probability and the Law of Averages there is no way that this would be possible. Unless that drawing that he plagiarized was actually, and covertly the storyboard for the film he hoaxed. That is the only answer that makes rational, logical sense. This is an indisputable fact. As if that wasn't stretching the bounds of the Laws of Probability we aren't done yet.... The sworn statement of the very same incident (which is the Roe Incident from 1955 told in 1957) contains an exact Play-By-Play of the Patterson - Gimlin film. This is indisputable. You cannot argue this because it is all on record and it predates the PG film by a decade. You cannot dispute this. You cannot dispute that Roger knew about it because he plagiarizzed the sketch and published it along with the account of the incident which contains the play-by-play of the PG Film. He literally published it in his book in 1966 a year prior. Let's dive in... ------ This, to the best of my recollection, is what the creature looked like and how it acted as it came across the clearing directly toward me. My first impression was of a huge man, about six feet tall, almost three feet wide, and probably weighing somewhere near three hundred pounds. It was covered from head to foot with dark brown silver-tipped hair. But as it came closer I saw by its breasts that it was female. (This is something Patterson was obsessed with the female breasts aspect of the tale which is what gave the idea and inspiration to put these anatomically incorrect features on his hoax costume) --------- Finally the wild thing must have got my scent, for it looked directly at me through an opening in the brush. A look of amazement crossed its face. It looked so comical at the moment I had to grin. Still in a crouched position, it backed up three or four short steps, then straightened up to its full height and started to walk rapidly back the way it had come. (Exactly as Patterson had instructed Bob H. to do and exactly what is seen on film) For a moment it watched me over its shoulder as it went, not exactly afraid, but as though it wanted no contact with anything strange. (The famous turn seen in the Patterson film and this is what gave inspiration for those actions within the film) ------ As you can see, not only does the sketch of this alleged incident that Patterson had plagiarized in his 1966 book look exactly what was shown on the film but the very description and dare I say dubious report of this unverified incident which Roe had reported is an exact play-by-play of the Patterson - Gimlin film. So if you ever wonder why it looked and behaved that way...well here is the script that Patterson used and the sketch is the storyboard that he used. I the portion of this account that gave Patterson the idea can be found in the portion in which Roe questions whether or not a movie was being made at the time. This is what sparked the idea and added as the catalyst for the entire hoax. So let's look at it again: As I watched this creature, I wondered if some movie company was making a film at this place and that what I saw was an actor, made up to look partly human and partly animal. But as I observed it more, I decided it would be impossible to fake such a specimen. Anyway, I learned later there was no such company near that area. Nor, in fact, did anyone live up Mica Mountain, according to the people who lived in Tete Jaune Cache. (Voila! This is what sparked the very idea for the hoax to begin with) Unless of course you believe that it’s possible that Roger stole a sketch of an incident and somehow magically filmed the exact same thing with the exact same sequence of events in an absolute play-by-play way 12 years later in a different location with an anatomically incorrect specimen. That’s not possible in any realm of rational thought.

Actuall story starts @ 49:15. Intro and backstory for the town of Van Meter and the time period was very useful information tho.

To me, it sounds like an angry old man placing his order through a faulty drive-through microphone. It actually made me laugh the first time I heard it.